Court: Killer’s conversations with husband not confidential

(Image: Shutterstock)

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — The Connecticut Supreme Court has ruled in a love-triangle murder case that a state law protecting a married couple’s conversations as confidential doesn’t apply to a convicted killer who protested the use of self-incriminating comments she made to her husband as evidence against her at trial.

Justices issued a 7-0 decision Thursday against Sheila Davalloo, who was convicted of murder for beating 32-year-old Anna-Lisa Raymundo and stabbing her nearly 20 times in her Stamford condominium in 2002.

Prosecutors said Davalloo killed Raymundo because she was in a sexual relationship with Raymundo’s boyfriend and wanted him to herself.

Davalloo’s husband testified that he lent her night-vision binoculars and eavesdropping devices. He said she had a lock-picking kit and practiced picking locks at home.

Davalloo previously lived in Pleasantville, New York.

WTNH NEWS8 provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Commenters who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. Please be respectful of the opinions of others. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review. Also, you can now block any inappropriate user by simple selecting the drop down menu on the right of any comment and selection "Block User" from there.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s