(ABC)– President-elect Donald Trump spent his Sunday lashing out against the movement to force general election vote recounts in three states that were critical to his Electoral College victory, but he is now alleging that “millions of people” voted illegally, costing him the popular vote.
“In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally,” Trump inaccurately claimed in a tweet, alleging — without any factual basis to make the claim — that millions of people voted for Hillary Clinton illegally. Clinton currently leads the national popular vote by close to 2 million votes.
In subsequent tweets Trump said “It would have been much easier for me to win the so-called popular vote than the Electoral College in that I would only campaign in 3 or 4 — states instead of the 15 states that I visited. I would have won even more easily and convincingly (but smaller states are forgotten)!”
In one tweet, he named Virginia, New Hampshire and California as three states with “serious voter fraud.”
In none of the tweets did Trump point to any evidence of voter fraud to account for his claim and no other evidence of his assertion has emerged since the election. ABC News reached out for comment to election officials in the three states Trump named, but had not received a response Sunday evening.
California Secretary of State Alex Padilla denied Trump’s claim about illegal voting in his state, calling them “unsubstantiated allegations” in a tweet Sunday night.
“It appears that Mr. Trump is troubled by the fact that a growing majority of Americans did not vote for him. His unsubstantiated allegations of voter fraud in California and elsewhere are absurd. His reckless tweets are inappropriate and unbecoming of a President-elect,” he tweeted.
The Trump transition team had not responded Sunday evening to a request for evidence Trump may be citing in his claims.
Kay Stimson, a spokeswoman for the National Association of Secretaries of State, said they “have no information that can help to explain what sources or information are behind the basis of the tweets” by Trump.
The Clinton campaign’s general counsel Marc Elias tweeted Sunday night that “We are getting attacked for participating in a recount that we didn’t ask for by the man who won election but thinks there was massive fraud.”
Elias announced Saturday in a post on Medium that the campaign would participate in the recount efforts, but is not seeking to cast any doubt on the Electoral College results, adding they have not found “any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology,” after looking into the matter.
In a tweet-storm Sunday morning, Trump attacked the Green Party-backed efforts to recount the vote in the key states of Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania this weekend, calling the effort ‘sad,’ while criticizing the Clinton campaign’s participation in the effort.
“Hillary Clinton conceded the election when she called me just prior to the victory speech and after the results were in. Nothing will change,” Trump tweeted.
A senior administration official told ABC News Saturday there did not appear to be any malicious activity related to the vote count, and remained confident regarding the overall assessment of the election’s integrity.
“The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting out electoral process on election day,” the official said. “As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective.”
Jill Stein and the Green Party said Friday they raised more than $4 million in three days to support recount efforts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, three key battleground states where Trump narrowly defeated Clinton.
Stein has maintained her activities are in no way intended to benefit Clinton, whom she leveled strong criticisms against during the 2016 election.
George Martin, a former co-chair of the Wisconsin Green Party who’s involved in Stein’s recount effort, said the party has been approached by computer scientists, election lawyers and other experts advocating vote recounts because of what they see as persuasive evidence of tampered election results. So far there has not been any verifiable evidence or proof of tampering or hacking.
He said the recounts are not to change the outcome of the results but are rather a check and balance on the process of counting votes.