Trump admin wanted to curtail former AG’s Russia testimony, lawyer alleges

(ABC)– The Republican chair of the House Intelligence Committee postponed a hearing featuring former acting Attorney General Sally Yates after her lawyer advised the Trump administration that she was planning to testify about internal discussions about Donald Trump‘s former national security adviser, Mike Flynn, and his communications with a Russian diplomat, ABC News has learned.

Any claim that those internal discussions are still confidential “has been waived as a result of the multiple public comments of current senior White House officials,” David O’Neil, an attorney for Yates, wrote in a letter to the White House on Friday — the same day that Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., announced that his committee, which has been investigating Russian meddling in last year’s presidential election, would no longer hear planned testimony this week from Yates, former CIA Director John Brennan or former Director of National IntelligenceJames Clapper.

The White House has denied taking any action to prevent that testimony.

“I hope she testifies. I look forward to it,” White House press secretary Sean Spicer said today. “We had no objection to her going forward … To suggest in any way, shape or form that we stood in the way of that is 100 percent false.”

Flynn resigned from the Trump administration last month after acknowledging that he gave “incomplete information” to Vice President Mike Pence and others about multiple calls with Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak in the days before Trump took office.

Pence repeated the false information when asked about the situation in January, prompting Yates to inform the White House that Flynn may have misled Pence and other senior officials about his communications with Kislyak.

In her testimony slated for today, Yates was expected to offer a firsthand account of her discussions with the White House in January.

On Thursday, O’Neil met with attorneys at the Justice Department to discuss — among other things — whether Yates was barred from testifying about certain details of those discussions. But the next morning, the Justice Department sent a letter to O’Neil, telling him any final determination rests with the White House.

“Such communications are likely covered by the presidential communications privilege and possibly the deliberative process privilege. The president owns those privileges. Therefore, to the extent Ms. Yates needs consent to disclose the details of those communications to HPSCI [House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence], she needs to consult with the White House. She need not obtain separate consent from the Department,” a Justice Department official wrote to O’Neil on Friday.

O’Neil then wrote his letter to the White House, insisting any claim of executive privilege had been waived “as a result of the multiple public comments of current senior White House officials describing the January 2017 communications. Nevertheless, I am advising the White House of Ms. Yates’ intention to provide information.”

The White House never responded to his letter — which he wrote would be taken as a green light for Yates to move forward.

“We didn’t respond. We encouraged them to go ahead,” Spicer said, adding that the White House never considered invoking executive privilege to block her testimony.

Spicer also insisted that Nunes’ decision to call off today’s hearing had nothing to do with any pressure from the White House. Nunes himself said that no one directed him to postpone the hearing.

Jack Langer, a spokesman for Nunes, similarly denied any coordination between the committee and White House over Yates’ testimony.

“Neither Chairman Nunes nor any Intelligence Committee staff members had any communication with the White House whatsoever about Sally Yates’ testifying to the committee,” Langer said in a statement. “The only person the committee has spoken to about her appearing before the committee has been her lawyer. The committee asked her to testify on our own accord, and we still intend to have her speak to us.”

The Washington Post first reported on the letters between O’Neil and the Trump administration.

Yates, an Obama administration appointee, was fired by Trump on Jan. 30 after she instructed the Justice Department not to defend his controversial executive order limiting travel and immigration from seven countries in Africa and the Middle East.

Nunes and the congressional inquiry he’s leading into alleged Russian interference have come under increasing criticism in recent days, after he first claimed he had discovered “concerning” evidence that the Trump campaign was monitored after the election.

Last week, Nunes announced he obtained “dozens of reports” showing the U.S. intelligence community — through its “normal foreign surveillance” — “incidentally collected information about U.S. citizens involved in the Trump transition.”

But Nunes cannot say whether Trump or any of the president’s associates personally participated in the communications that were intercepted, meaning it’s possible that the information he’s citing merely refers to foreign officials talking about Trump transition team members.

Nunes has yet to share the information with other members of the House Intelligence Committee or further explain what it shows. He said Tuesday that he will “never” reveal sources or methods to fellow committee members but that he still hopes to share the documents.

On Monday, without identifying his source, Nunes acknowledged he obtained the information while on White House grounds, an admission Democrats said should force him to at least recuse himself from the committee probe tied to Russia.

ABC News’ Mary Bruce, Jonathan Karl, Pierre Thomas and Adam Kelsey contributed to this report.

WTNH NEWS8 provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Commenters who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. Please be respectful of the opinions of others. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review. Also, you can now block any inappropriate user by simple selecting the drop down menu on the right of any comment and selection "Block User" from there.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s