HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — Two Connecticut lawmakers are calling for the dismissal of a Trinity College professor following comments he made in the aftermath of the shootings that took place Alexandria, Virginia last week.
Republican House Leader Themis Klarides and State Senator George Logan, both alumni of Trinity College, penned a letter to President Joanne Berger-Sweeney Wednesday, calling to remove Professor Johnny Eric Williams. In the letter, Klarides and Logan referred to comments Williams made in the aftermath of the shootings in Alexandria, Virginia.
The comments made by Williams suggest that white people need to be confronted for their white supremacist attitudes; among other statements. In reaction, Trinity College reiterated the school’s right on Facebook to remove comments that it deems “inappropriate, profane, defamatory, or disrespectful to users of the page and/or members of the greater Trinity College community,” but did not discipline Williams beyond that.
Klarides and Logan called the opinions “simply outrageous and racist in and of themselves.” The lawmakers urged Berger-Sweeney to remove Williams from the faculty.
The full letter from Klarides and Logan to Trinity College is below.
Dear President Berger-Sweeney,
As alumni of Trinity College, we are appalled at the published comments Professor Johnny Eric Williams made in the aftermath of the attempted assassinations in Alexandria, VA., a week ago ofRepublican members of Congress. We are calling upon the school to immediately, and permanently, remove Mr. Williams from the ranks of the school’s faculty. His reprehensible suggestions that white people in general need to “die” and that they be confronted for their white supremacist attitudes and mores goes beyond any imaginable level of social discourse.
In its initial response to this matter Trinity has fallen well short of the mark of what should reasonably be expected. Simply reiterating the school’s right on Facebook to remove comments that it deems “inappropriate, profane, defamatory, or disrespectful to users of the page and/or members of the greater Trinity College community,” is not acceptable.
Professor Williams’ opinions are simply outrageous and racist in and of themselves. We would urge you to consider this request as in the best interests of not only “members of the greater Trinity College community,” but of society at large.
We would be happy to discuss this matter further at your earliest convenience.
Themis Klarides, George S. Logan
Late Wednesday afternoon, Trinity College President Joanne Berger-Sweeney issued the following statement:
As many of you are aware, a set of social media posts by one of our faculty members has resulted in a loud and public rebuke and landed Trinity College in a national spotlight, both in the media and across various social media platforms. I understand the concerns many have expressed, and I’m especially grateful for the inquiries we’ve received from members of our community who’ve asked whether what they’re reading and hearing is accurate. To be clear, both personally and on behalf of the College that I represent, I do not condone hate speech or calls to incite violence.
I’ve spoken with Johnny Williams, who has been a sociology professor at Trinity since 1996. I wanted to hear directly from him about the messages he posted and what has transpired since. It is important to clarify a few details. On June 16, a writer who goes by the name “Son of Baldwin”—and who is not Johnny Williams—wrote a piece for Medium.com that cited another writer’s perspective on the shooting that occurred at the Congressional baseball practice in Virginia last week. The Medium piece went on to explore broader issues concerning race and the relationship between “victims of bigotry” and “bigots.” The piece culminated with a call to show indifference to the lives of bigots. That call was reprehensible, and any such suggestion is abhorrent and wholly contrary to Trinity’s values.
While Professor Williams did not write that article, he did share it on his personal social media accounts this week, and he did so with the use of a hashtag that connected directly to the inflammatory conclusion of that article. Professor Williams, who teaches about race and racism, shared the article on his personal Twitter account using that hashtag; he also shared it on his personal Facebook page.
The Dean of the Faculty will review this matter and advise me on whether college procedures or policies were broken. I told Professor Williams that in my opinion his use of the hashtag was reprehensible and, at the very least, in poor judgment. No matter its intent, it goes against our fundamental values as an institution, and I believe its effect is to close minds rather than open them.
I want to underscore that what we seek is to build a diverse college community that is welcoming to all viewpoints and backgrounds and that engages in civil discourse on even the most vexing issues. That requires that we continue to uphold our fundamental belief in academic freedom and support our community members’ constitutional right to free speech. But our aspirations for the community we want to be also demand we take particular care with the words we use and the contexts in which we use them.
This incident has caused distress on our campus and beyond; threats of violence have been directed to Professor Williams and to our campus community, neither of which is an acceptable response.
I denounce hate speech in all its forms, I will explore all options to resolve this matter, and I will be back in touch with our community members with our decisions.